Living Loud vocal thoughts on life, liberty, and spirituality

  • Bio
  • Blog
  • Literature
  • FAQ

Monthly archive: August, 2008

Hot for Palin!

August 30, 2008, by Doug 4 comments

 

About 18 months ago, when Barack Obama was running as a candidate of change and hope because Washington was broken, I was very interested in finding out if he would be the first Democrat I could truly stand behind. He wanted to stand against special interest groups. He was young, fresh, and wasn’t part of the Washington establishment. And he had charisma. I was excited to learn more. But it turned out that the more we knew about him, the more we realized that he’s no different from every left-wing Democrat, with the same Marxist platform and socialist leanings. While he may be talking a lot about change, he’s not much different from the typical Washington politician. 

And while John McCain is more of a “maverick” than Obama (something Obama sort of promised that he was), I’ve just never been excited about McCain.  

For months I’ve thought, “Sarah Palin would be a great choice, but she’d never be picked,” so the instant I saw her face on the Drudge Report just after she was announced, I was completely ecstatic. John McCain’s decision, in this particular case, made a ton of sense to me almost immediately. 

Obama promised us he would be different. Palin is a cut-the-crap kind of woman who took on her own party, even running against an incumbent governor of her own party. Obama promises to protect life, but she has literally protected the life of her youngest son, born with Down Syndrome, and doesn’t waver on the issue. She’s cut wasteful spending and started a savings account for the state of Alaska. She’s a woman, but she’s not a feminist. She’s not the traditional, I’ve-spent-my-life-wanting-to-be-in-power politician. She has a strong energy policy because she lives in a resource-rich state. She’s young, vivacious, and she’s probably the closest thing to what our founding fathers wanted out of democracy—a citizen legislator. 

And my favorite part about her is that on her first day in office as governor, she sold the private jet on eBay. Now that’s a hot move!


Links about Sarah Palin:

  • TimesOnline
  • Wikipedia

Doug

Doug Stuart is a committed follower of Jesus and passionate about building for the Kingdom of God through education and mobilization. He is a regular writer at LibertarianChristians.com as well as the founder of Living Loud.

Website - More Posts

Freedom is Golden

August 25, 2008, by Doug No comments yet

Click here to read Ron Paul on freedom. I highly recommend it.

Doug

Doug Stuart is a committed follower of Jesus and passionate about building for the Kingdom of God through education and mobilization. He is a regular writer at LibertarianChristians.com as well as the founder of Living Loud.

Website - More Posts

Stop Trying to Scare Us!

August 25, 2008, by Doug No comments yet

There’s a reason Al Gore is getting frustrated with the fact that his global warming message is not being well-received by the populace: despite all the fancy presentations, people aren’t willing to believe in something that feels more like a 1970s Pre-Trib Rapture scare film than it does a compelling encouragement to be better stewards our environment. 

The facts speak for themselves. In reality, the earth has warmed one degree in the past 100 years, and the warmest on record was 1997, over a decade ago (so “warming” is not occurring presently). The so-called “scientific consensus,” that is, the U.N.’s own IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report, has scientific articles that are noncommittal at best, but are largely not the consensus as Gore would have us believe. We also know (after Gore released his presentation) that CO2 emissions are always preceded by temperature increases, not the other way around (which would be like saying lung cancer causes smoking). Left out in most explanations of the problem is the fact that solar energy increases align more accurately with the Earth’s global temperature increases, as well as the fact that Mars and some moons on Jupiter are also experiencing global warming. More grossly exaggerated are the computer model scenarios, which have recently been debunked by the same scientists who created them. Even the IPCC data only estimates sea level rises to be a few inches, not twenty feet, as Gore predicts. 

Gore hasn’t fooled the British. Not only have the court systems in England mandated that any presentation in public schools of An Inconvenient Truth be counterpointed with an opposing viewpoint, recent polling says that 70% of British believe that the warnings about climate change are simply propaganda for higher taxes. 

So what does this mean for Christians? Tony Campolo, in Adventures in Missing the Point, says that Christians should be leading the way in “creation care.” I think he is absolutely correct because the narrative of Christianity has (in my estimation) the best basis for creation care compared to every other narrative, especially Darwinian evolution. Unfortunately, however, many of our Christian leaders are selling out to the socialist agenda. While declaring it our responsibility and mandate to take care of the environment, credence is given to the far left global warming propaganda. As I was reading Jim Wallis’ The Great Awakening, I was eager to read about his creation care theology and why we as Christians should be taking better care of the environment. Because Wallis has typically been pretty fair to two sides that disagree, and tends to come to a “middle ground,” I was greatly disappointed that he succumbed to the same tactics used by Al Gore et al: claim it as undeniable truth, call any dissenters “out of touch,” and insist that the issue is “settled.” Brian McLaren does a much better job at encouraging creation care: he merely cites the passion with which Al Gore preaches his message, and hopes that we as Christians would have the same fervor. 

To be rather honest, I’m sick and tired of Christians standing alongside far left political leaders who have nothing to offer except socialist agendas dubbed as “solutions.” Why aren’t they standing up as Christian leaders proposing Christian solutions to a problem that Christians should be tackling? Why aren’t they standing up against non-Christian tactics and proclaiming the real reason to be engaged in creation care? Instead, they have partnered with those who have used fear tactics and name-calling to silence opposing visions, and smear them as “anti-environment.” 

If there’s any question about my role as a citizen of the world, a child of God, and a thinking (not brainwashed) human being, let me spell it out: God created the world for us to “tend and keep,” not rape (sorry, Ann Coulter!). God has endowed us with the skills and talent to take better care of the environment, and it’s about time we do a much better job. As human beings (and especially as Christians), we should be championing the way to better and more eco-friendly ways of living. We should be “evangelizing” by our witness and our conversations that this is part of our lives as followers of Jesus. Because we believe the world was created by God, we believe we are to take better care of it than we have. 

It’s pretty simple, really.

Doug

Doug Stuart is a committed follower of Jesus and passionate about building for the Kingdom of God through education and mobilization. He is a regular writer at LibertarianChristians.com as well as the founder of Living Loud.

Website - More Posts

I’m Not Wasting My Vote

August 11, 2008, by Doug 2 comments

As it is today, I feel very little confidence in either Barack Obama or John McCain to do a good job as our next president. Whether they are right or wrong about an issue isn’t the point of this entry. Presently I want to point out that, in a democracy, we are to be voting for the person we believe would fulfill the role of President the way we would like them to. But what happens when we find no confidence in either candidate to do the job? Traditionally, we simply vote for a choice between two candidates, hoping that the things we dislike about them won’t play too big a part in what they will do in their role. 

That’s not how I want to spend my vote. I’m pretty tired of hearing about elections being about choosing between “the lesser of two evils,” which is an insult to each candidate. Somehow we continue to believe that we only have two choices because two candidates are getting all of the attention. Many of my friends on both sides of the political aisle have exclaimed that it’s too bad we only have two choices, and that we should have more parties in our country like there are in other countries. What I find ironic is that we fail to realize that we only have two choices because that’s all we continue to vote for. When a third candidate enters the race, we simply declare a vote for them a wasted vote, or we compromise our principles for a candidate who “isn’t as bad as the other guy.” Because we believe the third candidate seemingly doesn’t have a chance, voting for him or her is a waste of time. It’s just about as fallacious as the “one vote won’t matter” argument. 

The theory goes that if I vote for a third party candidate, or write somebody in, I’m voting for Obama. It goes without question that it isn’t a vote for McCain, but why not? Because the person stating so favors McCain, and assumes that’s a vote I would normally give to McCain. So when I fail to vote for McCain, I’m giving a vote for Obama. On the flip side, an Obama supporter might say my third party vote is a vote for John McCain. The reality is, it’s a vote against Obama and McCain, and a vote for the third party candidate. 

To not vote for somebody because they seemingly can’t win is simply perpetuating the so-called “problem of two choices.” So we choose between one party and the other party, and next election season, that’s all we have to choose from again. Then we again choose only those two candidates, and complain in the meantime about only having two choices. And so it becomes an endless cycle of choosing from the “top two” and then complaining there are only two to choose from. No wonder we feel “stuck” with only two parties! 

I do not believe that John McCain or Barack Obama will do everything in their power to promote freedom from the tyranny of controls. From what both of them are saying, government needs to play a larger role, spend more money on so-called crises, and fix all our problems or make them manageable. The truth is, our government is out of control with spending, borrowing, and wasting the people’s money. Barack Obama wants the government in more of our lives than ever before, with an unprecedented tax burden. All of his solutions involve bigger government, which means fewer freedoms. John McCain is only for small government unless he really thinks his way of getting the government into it is a bad thing. Both are bad for our future. 

I’ve agonized over this election. I’ve shed tears for our country’s future. But if we believe neither candidate can do the job, then we must vote for somebody for whom we believe can do the job (or we can simply not vote). It’s not a “wasted vote” because they might not win. It’s only a wasted vote when a vote is cast in spite of the voter not believing that candidate is the right person for the job.

Doug

Doug Stuart is a committed follower of Jesus and passionate about building for the Kingdom of God through education and mobilization. He is a regular writer at LibertarianChristians.com as well as the founder of Living Loud.

Website - More Posts

Obama vs. Exxon-Mobil

August 7, 2008, by Doug 6 comments

So this week Obama has been ranting about “windfall profits” of oil companies at a time when we are all complaining about high gas prices. In Lansing, MI, this week, he said that Exxon-Mobil made “$1,500 every second. That’s more than $300,000 in the time it takes you to fill up a tank with gas that’s costing you more than $4-a-gallon.” 

Yeah, so what? Coca-Cola made $36,690 by the time I just drank a 20-oz bottle of soda. Good for them. 

In reality, the earnings of “Big Oil” (which is 98.5% owned by the working class whose investments are in mutual funds) made only 7.4% profit last year. How exactly is that a “windfall profit”? Beverage and tobacco companies make 17.8%, computer companies made 13.7%, and manufacturing (not including the auto companies) made 8.6%. But why aren’t we hearing about their “windfall profits”? 

It’s because Obama is playing on where we’re complaining the most in our economy today. And it’s easy to begin the class warfare rhetoric, where the wealthy are demonized and the working man is pitted as a victim to the so-called evil oil companies, Obama is happy to take that tactic and run with it (I thought he was against dirty politics). 

What’s really happening is that Obama wants to provide tax cuts for the middle class and promise money (he calls it “relief”) to those who aren’t wealthy. But in order to fund it, he must find it elsewhere, and there’s no better place to look than to oil companies who make a lot of money. Some call that approach justice and equality. Others would say it’s a new form of envy. It’s pretty easy to label it Marxism because that’s what it is. It’s wrong. It’s unethical. 

But Obama will win the election, not because he’s promising relief from the government, but because as a people, we believe that this is what is good for us. But Benjamin Franklin knew better when he said, “When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” 

But at least we’ll have had a black president that will heal us and solve all our problems.

Doug

Doug Stuart is a committed follower of Jesus and passionate about building for the Kingdom of God through education and mobilization. He is a regular writer at LibertarianChristians.com as well as the founder of Living Loud.

Website - More Posts

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Currently Reading

  • Liberty Defined by Ron Paul
  • The Prophetic Imagination by Walter Brueggemann

Read at Your Own Risk

  • Acton Institute
  • Antiwar.com
  • Art Carden
  • Brian McLaren
  • Campaign for Liberty
  • Cato At Liberty
  • FEE
  • God’s Politics
  • John Stossel
  • Lew Rockwell
  • Libertarian Christians (LCC)
  • Life and Faith
  • Mike Todd (Waving or Drowning)
  • Mises.org
  • Robert P. Murphy
  • Simply Recipes
  • The C.S. Lewis Society
  • The Freeman
  • The Independent Institute
  • Waving or Drowning

Recent comments

  • Zeldamaster17: FYI, we are mortal...that's the whole point of your religion...
  • conscious: In the hierarchy of tyrants he sure have the highest...
  • Dorretta: I  think Hitler had more mercy then this "Jesus God...
  • Jesus wasn't god: Er, Jesus wasn't God.
  • Terry Pearson: I loved that book as well. I read it a...

Tag Cloud

abortion Austrian Economics Barack Obama brian mclaren capitalism christianity crisis Economics economy education Election fascism FDR Freedom free market government Great Depression greed health care hell Jesus jim wallis john mccain justice kingdom of God Libertarianism liberty marxism Obama Politics poverty pro-choice progressives Rediscovering Values ron paul Sarah Palin school choice social gospel socialism social justice society Sojourners taxation taxes thomas sowell

This is widgetised area:
Footer › Column 1

This is widgetised area:
Footer › Column 2

This is widgetised area:
Footer › Column 3

Copyright © 2011 Doug Stuart. All Rights Reserved.